The Ultimate Guide to Proving Race Realism

This is a simple and straight-forward guide to understanding the controversial subject of race realism. If properly read and followed, the information contained in this guide will provide the reader with the necessary tools to prove the reality of biological race with relative ease.

THE 4 ESSENTIAL POINTS TO PROVING RACE REALISM:

In order to be properly equipped and ready to explain race realism, this guide requires you to retain just 4 essential points, which are:

1) Defining the terms.
2) Evidence of the physiological and cognitive differences.
3) Genetic clustering analyses. 
4) Historical context.

Once you have these 4 pillars of race realism fully absorbed, you will be able to convince any reasonably minded person that race is a biological fact. Also, be sure to check the sources/references listed at the end of the article.

1. DEFINING THE WORD ‘RACE’ 

In order to prove the biological reality of race, we must first define what we mean when using the word ‘race’. 

It is accurate to say that the word race is fundamentally equivalent to the term sub-species; race is simply just a word we apply to human sub-species. Similarly, the word ‘breed’ is a term we commonly apply to canine sub-species. All of these terms can be distilled down to a common meaning. So, a sub-species, breed, or race can be defined in basic terms, such as:

Definition:  “A population within a species that forms its own group and takes on new characteristics.”

To identify examples of sub-species within a given species, we can observe the various Tiger sub-species; the Bengal Tiger, the Sumatran Tiger, and the Siberian Tiger are three examples of Tiger subs-pecies. Each sub-species can be distinguished from one another by observing  differences in size, shape, and colour pattern. Although the differences may be subtle, they are significant and consistent enough to warrant separate classifications.

There exists countless examples of species and relative sub-species that we can easily identify. For example, bears, dolphins, or beetles, all have a variety of sub-species, just to name a few. However, what’s important to note is that what determines one sub-species from another is based on simple criteria ranging from colour, size, shape of various physical features such as the eyes, nose, teeth, and other physical features. Pointing to Black Bears vs Brown Bears or African Elephants to Indian Elephants or Bottlednose Dolphins to common Dolphins, brings this point to greater clarity. Moving along, we can attempt to apply this method of distinguishing sub-species in the animal kingdom to humans to determine the existence of race.

2. THE PHYSIOLOGICAL AND COGNITIVE DIFFERENCES

This is perhaps the most important point of the four pillars of race realism, as we are now about to begin explaining the specific differences between the races from both a cognitive and physical perspective. 

I recommend you begin first by explaining the physiological differences between the races as it is easier to prove. Moreover, once the individual is convinced of the physical differences, intuition will allow them to be more likely to accept the cognitive difference; if human populations differ physically, is it not likely we differ cognitively as well?

African (Sub-Saharan) Biology in Comparison to Whites:

  • darker skin (more resilient to sun exposure, less resilient to cold temperatures)
  • distinctly textured hair
  • denser bones
  • less nasal cartilage, wider nostrils, shorter nasal pathway
  • longer limbs in proportion to torso
  • larger hands and feet
  • thicker and stronger nails, teeth, hair, and skin
  • higher distribution of fast twitch muscle fiber
  • larger reproductive organs

Blacks, on average, run at faster speeds, possess greater agility, and can maintain endurance longer than other races, and tend to make for better athletes. Here’s a short list of some examples you can use to support this fact:

1) Speed – all Olympic gold medals in the men’s 100m race in the last 40 years have been awarded to black athletes.  This cannot possibly be explained by coincidence or as a result of a lack of effort being put forth by white and Asian athletes. To suggest that Asians and whites “just aren’t trying hard enough” is asinine and might I dare say, “racist”???

2) Major Professional Sports – the NBA is comprised of approximately 80% black athletes and all but three of the NBA MVP awards in the past 40 years have been received by black players. Similarly, approximately 75% of the NFL is black, with a dominating majority of all-star or Pro-Bowl players being black. 

3) Combat Sports – The overwhelming majority of champion boxers have been black, likewise, a disproportionate amount of UFC champions have also been black fighters.

*Important point: You must also note that a population which represents only 13% of the total demographic makes up about 80% of the top paid athletes in American sports. There is no doubting that a biological advantage is what contributes most to black success within these highly athletic forms of competition  which demand tremendous amounts of speed, strength, and agility.

East Asians in Comparison to Whites:

  • epicanthic folds (slanted eyes)
  • darker hair
  • shorter limbs relative to torso
  • shorter muscles and tendons
  • less body hair
  • smaller skeletal frame
  • smaller hands and feet
  • less bone density
  • smaller reproductive organs
Moving along…

COGNITIVE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RACIAL GROUPS

Acquiring  the necessary knowledge needed to explain the differences in cognitive abilities among the races is just as important as the physical— if not more so. And there exists a plethora of evidence available which indicates that there are measurable differences in IQ among the races. For example, black Americans on average score about 90 on IQ tests, with white Americans scoring around 100-105 and east Asians (Chinese Korean etc) typically scoring around 105-110.  A 2009 paper by Wicherts, Dolan, and van der Maas contends that the average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans is about 80. In addition to IQ testing, we can also look at academic performance and representation in fields of work which require higher than average intelligence and we will note that blacks as a group are underrepresented and produce poorer results in comparison to Whites or East Asians as consitent results were found for college and university applicants such as the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) and Graduate Record Examination as well as for test applicants in corporate sections and in the military, all with large sample studies.

To avoid dedicating unnecessary time and space providing all the research needed to thoroughly prove the differences in cognitive ability and performance, I have provided a short list of sources at the bottom of the article for you to read/use at your convenience.

3. GENETIC CLUSTERING AND GENE DISTRIBUTION

This is aspect of race realism is slightly complicated, but with a little time and re-reading you’ll be able to absorb and reiterate the following information without having too much difficulty.

Human genetic clustering is the degree to which human genetic variation can be compartmentalized  into a small number of groups or clusters. Analysis of genetic clustering examines the degree to which regional groups differ genetically, and the categorization of individuals into clusters. Genetic structure studies are carried out using  computer programs designed to find clusters of genetically similar individuals within a sample group.

Human Genetic Cluster analysis show race can be genetically determined with a 95% certainty. That is to say, people who identify as being white or black can be confirmed through scientific analysis to be biologically of their self identified race by analyzing genetic clusters.  For example, if you select a group of 100 people made up of individuals from different self described races and have them anonymously provide their DNA to a lab, the lab could determine within a 95% success rate, the biological race of each individual.  This is an irrefutable example of how scientific analysis confirming our colloquial perception of race. However, this simple statement can quickly sum up what it is we are trying to prove: genes are not distributed equally among the various human populations–be they genes responsible for producing physical features or cognitive ability.

4. HISTORICAL & TECHNOLOGICAL COMPARISONS

In addition to genetics and biology, we can also point to the historical records and archeological discoveries which indicate major differences insofar as societal and technological advancements produced by the various races. For example, although most scientists in the relative fields of study will agree Africans have existed in the fossil record for much longer than any other race of humans, everything from wooden tools, to the wheel, to written language, was invented by non-Africans. Once man ventured out of Africa and evolved new characteristics to adapt to new surroundings, the people of Africa failed to keep up from a developmental standpoint. Africans were less developed and less advanced before the White man ever stepped foot onto the African continent. This fact is essential to convincing people that whites are not responsible for black Africa’s underdevelopment, and indeed, the other races of the world were all much more advanced than black Africa prior to encountering Blacks. So, without the argument of oppression forces coming from the White man, the only explanation that remains is that Blacks were (are) less evolved regarding collective cognitive performance.

Timeline of Technological Advancement:

500,000BC: Earliest evidence of purpose-built shelters – wooden huts – are known from sites in Japan
400,000BC Germany: Oldest Wooden tools and Weapons were invented.
12,000-35,000 years ago in Middle East: Agriculture begins
4,000BC: Farming spreads across Europe. When people began farming they stopped living in tents made from animal skins and they began to live in huts made from stone thatched roofs
3500BC: Written Language is invented by the Babylonians
3500B.C. Mesopotamia: Wheel is invented.
3000BC: The first long-distance trade occurred between Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley in Pakistan.
3000BC West Asia: The technique of making bronze objects was invented. Earliest form of metal craft.
500BC: Babylonians invent  Astronomy using arithmetic to predict the heavens.
510BC Greece: Earliest democracy in the world began with the work of a man named Cleisthenes, in Athens.

There are several reasons for why Africa failed to develop any of these major advancements on their own, nonetheless, here’s what I contend are the two main factors why Africans failed to develop anything noteworthy in comparison to non-African peoples.

  1. Having never left Africa and thus having never encountered  new environments and harsher conditions, Africans didn’t evolve to develop the same co-operation skills and long term thinking that is required to invent great things and build great civilizations. Life was easier in Africa and so traits associated with intelligence planning and foresight were not selected as strongly in African communities as they were in European ones.
  2. Sub-Sahara was detached from the rest of the world via the Saharan Desert which hindered Sub-Saharan African’s ability to advance. This was very important because the cradle of civilization — located in the Middle East — was where many technological advancements accrued . In deed, early Europeans were greatly benefited by middle Eastern advancements such as agriculture and the invention of the wheel, which the Greeks figured out to use for chariots 300 years after the Mesopotamians first invented it. 

The main point to be emphasized is that it is both illogical and factually incorrect to state that black underachievement is a result of colonialism or white oppression, and we possess the information to support and push this claim. 


Epilogue

Reviewing what was just gone over, we’ve clearly and accurately defined our terms, we’ve hammered down the concrete evidence and empirical data to show that there are tangible and measurable differences between the races, we’ve looked back at human history and technological advancement, we’ve examined athletic and cognitive performance, and we now possess the knowledge and resources needed to prove just exactly how and why race, is in fact, REAL.

I hope you found this guide to be insightful and helpful, and I encourage you to engage with as many individuals as possible on this subject to help expel the myths and expose the truth surrounding the topic of race realism.

Thank you for reading, please give this a share, and I wish you all the best with redpilling your friends and family!


Sources/References:
Physiological differences between races:
Genetic clustering:

Thank you for visiting ronnycameron.com and please remember to subscribe! 

 

6 thoughts on “The Ultimate Guide to Proving Race Realism

  1. How was your very lonely birthday, Ronny? Spent writing racist garbage on the very respectable WordPress.com?

  2. I wasn’t expecting to find others on this website in 2020 who thought this was trash like me! Have a good day!

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.