The Ultimate Guide to Proving Race Realism

This is a simple and straight forward guide to understanding the highly controversial  subject of race realism. If properly read and followed, the information contained in this guide will provide you with the necessary tools to prove the reality of biological race.

In order to become well-versed and ready to explain race realism, this guide  requires you to retain just 4 essential points, which are:

1) Defining the terms.

2) Evidence of the physiological and cognitive differences.

3) Genetic clustering analyses. 

4) Historical context.

Once  you have these 4 pillars of race realism  embedded into your brain, you will be able to convince any reasonably minded person that race is a biological fact.  

So, let’s get started.


In order to prove the biological reality of race, one must first define what one means when using the word ‘race’. 

The word race is fundamentally equivalent to the term subspecies; race is simply just a word we apply to human subspecies. Similarly, the word ‘breed’ is a term we commonly apply to canine subspecies. All of these terms can be distilled down to a common meaning. So, a subspecies, breed, or race, can be defined in basic terms, such as:

Definition:  “A population within a species that forms its own group and takes on new characteristics.”

An example of subspecies are the various tigers; The Bengal tiger, the Sumatran tiger, and the Siberian tiger are three examples of tiger subspecies. There are countless examples of species and relative subspecies that we can easily come up with— for example  bears, dolphins, or beetles— but there should be no need to exhaust this point any further. Your opponent (or friend or whomever) will most likely understand the logic you are presenting, and it would be wise for both/all parties to progress the discussion /debate. 

Moving along, we can now attempt to determine subspecies based on a variety of criteria ranging from colour, to size, shape, ability, mating and behavioural patterns, etc.

Within the human population we have many races, although there is much debate as to how many and where to correctly draw distinction between groups. However, we can safely assert that at the very least, there exists three racial categories; Caucasoid, Mongoloid, and negroid.

The overwhelming majority of experts in the field agree there’s likely 5-12 distinct racial groups with respect to humans, but we can safely say there are at least three. 


This is perhaps the most important point of the four pillars of race realism, as we are now about to begin explaining the specific differences between the races from both a mental and physical perspective. 

I recommend you begin first with the physiological differences between the races because it is slightly less controversial than race and intelligence, and you will find that people are more likely to agree with the physical differences than the cognitive differences  because it isn’t quite as offensive or “racist” in the minds of normies. 

Now, the physiological differences are easy to point out, and nothing is simpler than showing the differences in athletic skill sets with respect to race, Blacks, on average run at faster speeds, possess better agility, and can maintain endurance longer than any other races— and there is ample evidence to prove this. But before you delve into the science, first dispense a few devastating factoids regarding black athletic accomplishments. Here’s a short list of some examples you can use to begin your attack:

1) Regarding speed, every  Olympic gold medal in the men’s 100m race in the last 40 years has been awarded to black athletes.  This cannot possibly be coincidence or as a result of lack of effort p ut forth by white or Asian athletes. To suggest that Asians and whites “just aren’t trying hard enough” is asinine and might I dare say, racist?

2) All but 3 of the NBA MVP awards in the past 40 years have been received by black players.

3) Approximately 75% of the NFL is black, with a dominating majority of all-star or pro-bowl players being black. 

4) The overwhelming majority of Boxing champions have been black, whilst a disproportionate amount of UFC champions have been black fighters.

You must also note that a population which represents only 13% of the total demographic makes up about 80% of the top paid athletes in American sports. There is no doubting that a biological advantage is what contributes most to black success within these highly athletic forms of competition  which demand tremendous amounts of speed, strength, and agility. 

But what specific biological  physical differences allows for such athletic superiority”, you ask?  Well, there are plenty. In comparison to non-blacks, on average, blacks have:

•denser bones.
•less nasal cartilage, wider nostrils, shorter nasal pathway.
•larger hands and feet.
•broader shoulders.
•thicker and stronger nails, teeth, hair, and skin.
•higher distribution of fast twitch muscle fibre.
•longer and leaner muscles.
•longer limbs and shorter torso.    
•shorter gestation period.
•less likely to develop arthritis, vitamin deficiencies, depression, less resilient to hot temperatures/sunburn, etc. 
•more likely to develop diabetes, obesity, high blood pressure, dry irritable skin, less resilient to cold temperatures, etc.
•darker skin.
•distinctly texturized hair.
•distinct vocal tones.

Conversely, Asians, in comparison to other races, tend to have:

 less dense bones.
•shorter limbs relative to torso.
•shorter muscles and tendons.
•smaller skeletal frame.
•smaller hands and feet.

East Asians are typically less athletic and do not perform nearly as well as whites or blacks at the professional level.

Highlighting the various physical  differences is quintessential to proving race realism, but luckily for us, we have options.
*(references near bottom)

Cognitive Ability

Acquiring  the necessary knowledge needed to explain the differences in cognitive abilities among the races is just as important as the physical— if not more so. And there exists a plethora of evidence available which indicates that there are measurable differences in IQ among the races. For example, black Americans on average score about 90 on IQ tests, with white Americans scoring around 100-105 and east Asians (Chinese Korean etc) typically scoring around 105-110.  A 2009 paper by Wicherts, Dolan, and van der Maas contends that the average IQ of sub-Saharan Africans is about 80.
*(references near bottom)

*Here’s a list of individuals whom have contributed greatly to the discussion of race and IQ:
Nicholas Wade 
•Arthur Jensen 
•Kyle Rushton
•Charles Murray
•David Reich 
•JF Gariepy 
•Ryan Faulk (AKA alternative hypotheses) 
•Sam Harris 
•Stefan molyneux 
•Jordan Peterson


This is slightly complicated, but with a little time and re-reading you’ll be able to absorb and reiterate the following information with ease. 

Human genetic clustering is the degree to which human genetic variation can be compartmentalized  into a small number of groups or clusters. Analysis of genetic clustering examines the degree to which regional groups differ genetically, and the categorization of individuals into clusters. Genetic structure studies are carried out using  computer programs designed to find clusters of genetically similar individuals within a sample group. 

Human Genetic Cluster analysis show race can be genetically determined with a 95% certainty. That is to say, people who identify as being white or black can be confirmed through scientific analysis to be biologically of their self identified race by analyzing genetic clusters.  For example, if you select a group of 100 people made up of individuals from different self described races and have them anonymously provide their DNA to a lab, the lab could determine within a 95% success rate, the biological race of each individual.  This is an irrefutable example of how scientific analysis confirming our colloquial perception of race. 


In addition to genetics and  taxonomy, one must also point to the historical records and archaeologic discoveries which indicate major differences insofar as societal and technological advancements produced by the various races. For example; although Africans have existed for far much longer than any other race of humans. everything from wooden tools, to the wheel, to written language— was invented by non-Africans. Basically once man ventured out of Africa and evolved new  characteristics to adapt to new surroundings, the people of Africa failed to keep up from a developmental standpoint. This is essential to convincing people that whites are not responsible for black Africa’s underdevelopment, and indeed, the other races were much more advanced prior to having encountered each other. 

So let’s take a look at where an when the most significant advancements prior to colonialism and even the advent of Christianity took place…

Timeline of Technological Advancement:

500,000BC: Earliest evidence of purpose-built shelters – wooden huts – are known from sites in Japan
400,000BC Germany: The Oldest Wooden tools and Weapons were invented.
12,000-35,000 years ago in Middle East: Agriculture begins
4,000BC: Farming spreads across Europe. When people began farming they stopped living in tents made from animal skins and they began to live in huts made from stone thatched roofs
3500BC: Written Language is invented by the Babylonians 
3500B.C. Mesopotamia: Wheel is invented.
3000BC: The first long-distance trade occurred between Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley in Pakistan.
3000BC West Asia: The technique of making bronze objects was invented. Earliest form of metal craft.
500BC: Babylonians invent  Astronomy using arithmetic to predict the heavens.
510BC Greece: The earliest democracy in the world began with the work of a man named Cleisthenes, in Athens.

We should also not that ancient Romans Contributed great technological advancements as well . They developed an array revolutionary advancements including the including the invention of concrete, Roman Roads, Roman arches, and aqueducts.

There are several reasons for why Africa failed to develop any of these major advancements on their own, nonetheless, here’s what I contend are the two main factors why Africans failed to develop anything noteworthy in comparison to non-African peoples. 

  1. Having never left Africa and thus having never encountered  new environments and harsher conditions, Africans didn’t evolve to develop the same co-operation skills and long term thinking that is required to invent great things and build great civilizations. Life was easier in Africa and so traits associated with intelligence planning and foresight were not selected as strongly in African communities as they were in European ones.  
  2. Sub-Sahara was detached from the rest of the world via the Saharan Desert. This was very important because the cradle of civilization — located in the Middle East — was where many technological advancements accrued . In deed, early Europeans were greatly benefited by middle Eastern advancements such as agriculture and the invention of the wheel, which the Greeks figured out to use for chariots 300 years after the Mesopotamians first invented it. 


It is both illogical and factually incorrect to state that black underachievement is a result of colonialism or white oppression, and now you possess the information to support and push this claim. 


 From defining our terms to laying out the ground work— to hammering down the concrete evidence and empirical data— you now possess the knowledge and the resources  to prove just exactly how and why race, is in fact, … REAL! 

I hope you found this guide to be insightful and helpful, and I encourage you to engage with as many individuals as possible on this subject to help expel the myths, and expose the truth, of Race Realism.


Race & IQ:
Physiological  differences between races:
Genetic clustering: •

Related Videos: 

Support this site by making a small donation

Thank you for visiting and please rememb­er to subscribe! 

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.